As more ladies become minds of state, will the world actually change?
Christian Hartmann / Reuters
Margot Wallstrom took workplace as Sweden’s foreign minister in 2014, declaring she’d pursue a “feminist international policy.” She’s now held the post for just two years, plus it’s nevertheless perhaps not totally clear exactly what she designed. Although it’s correct that a whole college of feminist international-relations concept has continued to develop since the 1980s, the field remains contested, and mainly untested into the world of policy. You might surmise from Wallstrom’s term, it say, for example, about the logic of preventive war as she herself stated, that a “feminist foreign policy” would promote women’s rights around the world, but what would? Wouldn’t it focus on trade that is free open edges, or stress protecting workers from competition? Would it not produce a new method of coping with unsecured material that is nuclear the previous Soviet Union?
Provided, Wallstrom have not had enough time to implement the concept; in accordance with longstanding foreign-policy traditions like realism, feminist international policy hasn’t yet had the opportunity to keep a lot of a history. Continue reading “The Myth for the ‘Female’ Foreign Policy”